Am 08.09.2013 19:20, schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 17:32:55 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:11:05PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> no idea why the FF maintainer does not try to install his own >>> package for days or at least replace it with a clean build >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004062 >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005094 >>> >>> that RPM has a bug at it's own and must not segfault is >>> a different story but the current situation present all >>> users with "updates-testing" enabled daily segfaults >>> if they do not exclude firefox is terrible >> >> You've already provided your karma at >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-15912/firefox-23.0.1-4.fc18 >> >> No need to repeat on -devel. > > I agree with Harald. If the maintainer doesn't withdraw the update, > posting about that can help with getting more testers to vote -1 as well as bring the unacceptable attitude of some maintainers to a broader audience - "I simply don't have F18 anymore"?? users which are contribute with testing are not monkeys every random maintainer can feed his completly untested junk-updates because he is too lazy to do his homework, google for KVM and at least test if the result in installable and starts if someone is unable to verify what he is doing he has to keep his fingers from it - period >> Calm down please. Package went only to updates-testing and this channel is for >> testing only. It didn't go to stable. I simply don't have F18 anymore and I >> can't test package for all Fedoras. That's why we have update-testing >> repository and update tool with karma feedback
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct