On 2013-09-11 15:41, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/11/2013 03:32 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-09-11 15:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Asking her "Do you want to make security changes to share directory
/home/phyllis/Share?" Or
Do you want to make security changes to share Printer XYZ?
Would make sense.
My marriage would be facing serious troubles, if my wife opens any
port on our shared machines ;)
Seriously, I think you guys are forgetting Linux isn't a
Single-User-Single-Seat OSes.
Ralf
Well, it is. Also.
Sure, Single-User-Single-Seat systems are a singular, degenerated case
of Multi-User-Multi-Seat systems.
And hat's really the core here. It's so damned
different in these two cases.
Correct, it means that Single-Seat-Single-User focused approaches
often lack the generality required on Multi-User-Multi-Seat systems.
It often means approaches, which are easily applicable on other OSes,
will never fly on Linux.
Ralf
This discussion could easily fly away. Trying to stay on topic: what we
are discussing so far is hints for firewall configuration for each
application. I don't think anyone should be upset by that. The key issue
is just *who* is punching the hole. But isn't this as simple as having
administrative rights for this, which some wifes have and some don't?
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
