On 9/9/13 10:56 AM, Till Maas wrote: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 05:35:05PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> If people want to switch the Fedora default to XFS, I'll gladly file >> the feature. :) > > Why is XFS better than ext4. When I checked a few months ago, XFS did > not even support shrinking, but only growing. Even now there seems to be > only xfs_growfs on F19, but no tool to shrink it. There is no universal "better" so I won't argue that point. TBH, ext4 is probably more performant for the most common types of machines, storage, and workloads under typical Fedora </handwave>. XFS really shines as things get bigger - bigger storage, more cpus, more memory, more spindles. As for shrink, you are right - there is no xfs shrink. (OTOH, I have seen a fair bit of damage done by ext4 shrink, so I'm not so sure lack of shrink should count *against* xfs) ;) -Eric > Regards > Till > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
