On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:44:51 -0600 Andrew McNabb <amcnabb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I tried tracking down the problem using an ARM virtual machine using > these instructions, but it was too slow in helping track down the > failed tests (in fact, it had many more failed tests). > > As a "temporary" measure, I then changed python-pexpect to no longer > be a noarch package. It looks like this will have a ripple effect, > requiring python-ipython (an important package) to lose noarch. > > At present, the upstream maintainer and myself have no way to track > down the problem because no one has ARM hardware running Fedora. So > it could be a very long time before this is fixed. > > Since ARM is a primary architecture but ARM hardware running Fedora is > so rare, it would be nice if there were some way to give upstream > maintainers access to ARM machines to track down bugs. I just mailed you directly a few minutes ago about this. ;) We have these: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/qa-machines that I can get you access to. I have some I want to make always available to packagers, but I am waiting on a firmware upgrade that will allow us to seperate out that traffic from all the other SOC's in that same chassis. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
