Am 05.09.2013 22:04, schrieb Przemek Klosowski: > On 09/05/2013 02:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> so, no whatever macro is repsonsible for this exactly at the release with a non well thought release name this >> happens -why in the world does Fedora again and agin make decisions which are *not* tested and months before >> release the impact is known are *not* reverted? *do not touch my hand-made grub-configuration due kernel-updates* >> except teh path to the kernel and initrd which works since many years - *nobody* needs release names at all and >> and least nobody needs inisting in show them at the first output at boot in a broken way > There seem to be two separate issues here---correct me if I am wrong. Issue 1) is whether the boot message should > show Fedora release numbers---it could be argued either way but in any case isn't a big deal IMHO. Issue 2) is a > conflict with your 'hand-made grub-configuration'. This could not have been tested by anyone else but you, then? what? * there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name * the releas ename is dispalyed *boken* due the unwise name with special chars so where this is *my* fault? don't get me wrong, i love many things in Fedora, otherwise i would not use it but chose a release name with special chars not handeled by the bootloader is quite stupid - in /boot/grub2/grub.conf it is a ö but this does help not much as long GRUB2 beside ither major bugs is too stupid to display it well, and sicne my primary language is german the ö is *natural* here and that more ironic is that the bootloader can not hanlde the chosen release name drop them at all from the distribituion i *never* faced any person who was able to name fedora release by that name
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
