There are many false positive issues with RubyGems in the report. Namely about: 279 GemCheckRequiresRubygems https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/224 333 RubyCheckTestsRun https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/225 I already submitted patch to address the first issue. Regards Josef ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alec Leamas" <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:19:01 PM Subject: Overall rawhide package testing. As agreed [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages in current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are reports on issues by package and packages by issue. We have discussed sending email about these results to the package owners. Is this a good idea? In any case, I think it might be good if you check your own packages, chances are that something otherwise unnoticed is discovered. Please don't forget the README. For those interested in the overall distribution, the package by issue reports perhaps also might add something as well as the 'stats' file in the top dir. --alec [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/188133.html [2] http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/tree/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
