Re: Overall rawhide package testing.

[Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/26/2013 04:38 PM, Mat Booth wrote:

On 26 August 2013 13:19, Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As agreed  [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages in current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are reports on issues by package and packages by issue.

We have discussed sending email about these results to the package owners. Is this a good idea? In any case, I think it might be good if you check your own packages, chances are that something otherwise unnoticed is discovered. Please don't forget the README.

For those interested in the  overall distribution, the package by issue reports perhaps also might add something as well as the 'stats' file in the top dir.


--alec


[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/188133.html
[2] http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/tree/
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

From the README: "The package reports all fail on CheckBuildInMock and CheckBuildRequires."

I'd rather you didn't send out a mass email until I can filter these out see just the genuine failures.

--
Mat Booth

Definitely. As well as some other issues with too high fail rate e. g., CheckSoFiles.

Perhaps we should think the other way: which issues are serious and well.defined enough to make an email motivated?

--alec

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct