Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 26.08.2013 11:07, schrieb Florian Weimer:
> On 08/24/2013 11:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901
>>
>> looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
>> which does not support EECDHE which is a shame these
>> days in context of PRISM and more and more Ciphers
>> are going to be unuseable (BEAST/CRIME weakness)
> 
> Current Fedora supports perfect forward secrecy just fine

it does *not*
yes it does in theory

> It's just that web server operators routinely refuse to offer it. 

cause and effect
because Fedora does *not* support Ciphers without large performance impacts

in reality without ECDHE you have no way
go to https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/ and look at the client-handshakes
practically no client is using PFS without ECDHE

that's the truth if it comes to PFS and Redhat/Fedora
http://www.internetstaff.com/roller/blog/entry/enable_elliptical_curve_diffie_hellman
http://www.theverge.com/2013/6/26/4468050/facebook-follows-google-with-tough-encryption-standard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux