On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:56:06AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:33:59AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mat Booth <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Here's my favourite bugbear: https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/243 > > > > > > > > > I have no idea why the package retirement process needs intervention from > > > rel-eng.-- > > > Mat Booth > > > http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora > > > > > > > > There's been discussion of adding "fedpkg retire-package" to fedpkg which > > would basically just open a dead.package file to allow you to add an entry > > and then remove the contents from git, block the package in koji, and > > retire it in the package DB. I don't think anyone has had the time to do > > this yet both in fedpkg and the backend although I suspect this gets a > > whole lot easier now with fedmsg. > > For the fedpkg/packaged DB integration you can try this patch: > https://fedorahosted.org/fedpkg/attachment/ticket/8/0001-retire-packages-in-packagedb-as-well.patch > > If you first apply http://ur1.ca/f6nkk you can run fedpkg from the git > repo directly to test it. I do not have a package to retire, therefore I > was not able to test it yet. > > A script to get all retired packages from datanommer is also already > working pretty good. It only needs integration to listen on fedmsg to > get it completely automated: > http://ur1.ca/f6xco Your two paste have expired, mind to send new ones with a longer lifespan? thanks, Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
