On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 22:05 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > since i have enough of bugzilla-mails as response of bugreports > containing referecnes to any Fedora version but not the reported > i consider this as bug in the distribution itself > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998035 > > *at least* a "we do not fix this in F18 because <short explaination>" > or "it will most likely done in the next package-update for Fq8" > would be what anybody who is wasting his time for verify things > in the distribution and report bugs/guideline-violations should > be a response > ___________________________________ > > hence i even do not understand why not every maintainer is reading > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE and after > logout from the DE calls "checksec --proc-all" and *MUST enable* > in the guidelines is no opt-in > > as well as read things like > http://tk-blog.blogspot.co.at/2009/02/relro-not-so-well-known-memory.html > > thanks god, some of the packages i reported in the last months > are in the meantime fixed - but why maintainers and/or at least > QA do not care that the guidelines are respected? We don't have the resources for all this stuff, to be honest. I'd never seen any of the bugs you link in this mail before. There is no QA-matron which sees all bugs filed in Fedora, I'm afraid. There's a small group of monkeys running as fast as we can to keep up with release validation and update testing, pretty much. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
