John (J5) Palmieri (johnp@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > I hadn't gotten to the point of looking at the code yet. I was going to > make some test packages, see how it worked as an esd replacement and > then go ahead and start looking at it. If it is as you say, > impenetrable spaghetti, then I don't want to gain yet another > unmaintainable package. Is it your position that the things that are > wrong with Polyaudio would be harder to fix than just fixing esd? Or > perhaps there are better alternatives around? If we can find a solution > that is easy to integrate, maintain and audit I am all for that. Well... direct alsa usage can handle the ESD stuff, as long as you don't care about network audio (and someone may want to write a shim esd-like layer for playback.) How important is network audio, anyway? Bill
