Re: What to do with a noarch package that fails to build on ARM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:55:57 -0500
Andrew McNabb <amcnabb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 03:32:37PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > 
> > Are you *sure* that this is an ARM-related failure? The ARM
> > builders are picking up a lot of load for noarch builds, and it may
> > just be a coincidence that the test fails.
> 
> The same package works fine on Fedora 19, so I'm pretty sure it's
> ARM-related.  Is there a way I can do a scratch build for x86_64 on
> Fedora 20 just to make sure that it's ARM-related?
koji build --scratch --arch-override=x86_64 f20 <srpm>

> > > What's the right way to deal with this situation?  Is it possible
> > > to block the noarch package from the ARM architecture?
> > 
> > That's definitely not the right way. :)
> 
> I suspected as much. :)
> 
> --
> Andrew McNabb
> http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/
> PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55  8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlIUGwoACgkQkSxm47BaWffLYwCfTHUZ3gBtfHZ30+lnsAtQOJtF
HSEAoJ4rngi6uiS473aUWPJtzNfePoRl
=ivc7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux