Re: An even closer look: Obsolete but still included packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:42:59AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> Good catch! The Obsoletes tag in python-pexpect is too low, so not even
> the previous build obsoletes pexpect yet. That's a common mistake done
> by some packagers:
> 
>   http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=3752616
>   Obsoletes 	pexpect <= 2.3-9

I've bumped the obsoletes version number and submitted an update, but it
would be nice if there a better way of specifying obsoletes that weren't
nearly so brittle.

--
Andrew McNabb
http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/
PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55  8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux