Re: bug filed against "distribution"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:05:57 +0200
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> since i have enough of bugzilla-mails as response of bugreports
> containing referecnes to any Fedora version but not the reported
> i consider this as bug in the distribution itself
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998035
> 
> *at least* a "we do not fix this in F18 because <short explaination>"
> or "it will most likely done in the next package-update for Fq8"
> would be what anybody who is wasting his time for verify things
> in the distribution and report bugs/guideline-violations should
> be a response

Why not simply ask in a bug comment? 

"Thanks for the f19/f20 updates, but I reported against f18, is there
any way you can backport this fix to f18 for me please?"

I think most maintainers would answer that and try and accommodate you.
Perhaps they missed that it was filed against f18, or they thought that
you just wanted it fixed in newer releases, etc. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux