Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel <lars.seipel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
>>> point in time.
>>
>> Reforking? And then wait until the bitrot sets in again? ;-)
>>
>> Can't you just use gnome-bluetooth proper and resurrect the panel icon
>> stuff like Kalev proposed?
>
> Not so simple as reverting a commit. Must discuss with upstream.
>
> Dan


Also as Wolfgang (comaintainer for MATE) said and I personally would
like to reiterate:

"3. Also runtime dependencies needs to be checked, we don't want to be
install more gnome as necessary in mate."

The whole point of forking to be dependant on gnome upstream as little
as possible.

Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux