Re: Bundled Flash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/15/2013 02:45 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf) files,
but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash
toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the source for these files.
:-(

It has never been permissible to included prebuilt files of this nature in
Fedora [1], and FPC unequivocally stated during today's meeting that they have
no interest in making an exception for this.

Please remove this prohibited content from your packages, or ensure that any
included .swf files are built from source using a free software toolchain like
`swfc` during the %build phase.  A list of affected packages sorted by owner is
included below, and I'll be filing bugs for these soon.

-T.C.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries


orion ckeditor

Thanks. Turns out ckeditor also had a raw .fla file. I don't know if any package would have a .fla without a .swf, but it might be worth checking for.


--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux