On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 10:27 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 16:14 +0200, Frank Schmitt wrote:
> > Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:40 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:52:44AM -0400, Build System wrote:
> > >> > Updated Packages:
> > >>
> > >> Is this post-FC3 stuff or will (parts) appear in FC3 final?
> > >
> > > rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably
> > > change very soon
> >
> > <rant>So an update to an Evoltion bugfix release is ok, an update to a
> > KDE bugfix release two(?) weeks earlier is not. Great.</rant>
>
> The updated evolution package isn't an update to a new version. It's an
> updated build with a specific, small, targeted fix for a specific bug
> that had been filed and was on the blocker list for the release.
>
> If evolution were updated to version 2.0.3, then you could rant :)
I think he complains (and complained earlier) about evo being updated to
2.0.2 in the first place.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
