Re: Is the %doc macro supposed to work in rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is the %doc macro supposed to work in rawhide?
From: Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 07:41:34 +0800
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130809232251.GA6604@wolff.to>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Any Koji logs available ?

Sent from Note I

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the %doc macro supposed to work in rawhide?
  - From: Bruno Wolff III

References:
- Is the %doc macro supposed to work in rawhide?
  - From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Is the %doc macro supposed to work in rawhide?
  - From: Bruno Wolff III

Prev by Date: Re: Is the %doc macro supposed to work in rawhide?
Next by Date: Re: heads up: cogl soname bump
Previous by thread: Re: Is the %doc macro supposed to work in rawhide?
Next by thread: Re: Is the %doc macro supposed to work in rawhide?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux