On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:52:23 +0200 Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 09.08.13 16:34, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar > (asamaddar@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > I have no idea about hte package in question, but be aware that > > > you need to pass --prefix=/usr (among other things) to configure > > > for all packages packaged for Fedora. This is documented in more > > > detail in the Fedora packaging guidelines. > > > > > > If you end up with /usr/local in a path then this indicates that > > > you didn't pass --prefix=/usr correctly or you found a bug in the > > > upstream build scripts. > > > > > > Lennart > > > > > > > The package configures and builds fine. The default %configure > > macro automatically sets the prefix to /usr. Michael was saying > > that the binary path in the service file should be set by the > > configure or make commands so this would require some knowledge of > > autoconf. > > If the unit files are shipped upstream, and are hardcoded to point to > /usr/local, then that's an upstream bug really. Please ask them to > generate them with sed or so with the right path filled in. > > Lennart > The unit file did point to /usr/local/bin. I contacted upstream and they changed it to /usr/bin. I was then led to believe that the path had to be generated during the build process as I've mentioned previously and it's not satisfactory to include a manually written unit file with the path already set. If it is I'll inform upstream and this issue can be closed. Ananda -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
