On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 16:19 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > On 08/07/2013 04:12 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > >> On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 17:23 -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: > >>> I have installed Fedora 17/18/19 (selected Minimal installation) from > >>> DVD and it completed successfully, however there is no tar tool. > >>> > >>> Was this change intentional? Thoughts? > >> > >> Why do you say 'change'? From a quick look in comps, tar has never been > >> in the 'minimal' group (which was called @base up until a few releases > >> ago and is now called @core). > > > > Formerly, it was pulled in by 'sos' in base/standard - it's now explicitly > > listed there. > > The sos spec file still lists tar as a dependency. This is actually > false now as we're using the python TarFile class instead. > > Does this mean that sos is no longer in base/standard? The two are not interchangeable. And, er, base no longer exists. There is @core, which is basically 'minimal'. Then there is @standard , which is 'a typical base system'. tar is directly in @standard, it is not in @core. sos is in @standard, not in @core. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
