Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 23:27:42 +0200, Till Maas wrote:

> Package gnome-vfs2 (orphan)

> List of deps left behind by packages which are orphaned or fail to build:

Without examining the script, it seems it doesn't handle the dependencies
of dependencies but just the first level. Is that expected?
 
> Removing: gnome-vfs2
>     gnome-python2-gnomevfs requires libgnomevfs-2.so.0
>     gnome-python2-gnomevfs requires gnome-vfs2(x86-32) = 2.24.4-13.fc20

What happens if gnome-python2-gnomevfs gets removed as well?

  # repoquery --whatrequires gnome-python2-gnomevfs|sort
  gnome-commander-3:1.2.8.15-7.fc19.1.x86_64
  gnome-commander-4:1.2.8.15-8.fc19.x86_64
  gnome-python2-gnome-0:2.28.1-12.fc19.x86_64
  gramps-0:3.4.5-2.fc19.noarch
  hotssh-0:0.2.7-6.fc19.noarch
  hotwire-0:0.721-11.fc19.noarch
  memaker-0:20100110-5.fc19.noarch
  pybliographer-0:1.2.15-6.fc19.noarch
  revelation-0:0.4.14-4.fc19.x86_64
  soundconverter-0:2.0.4-24.fc19.noarch
  specto-0:0.4.1-4.fc19.noarch

> The script that generated this page can be found at
> http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/find-unblocked-orphans.py
> There you can also report bugs and RFEs.

Where exactly?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux