On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The guideline should be to ask upstream to fix the meta data. In case of > missing license text (e.g. source code with a GPL header but no copy of > the GPL itself), it is also upstream's task to fix it and the packager's > to ask for it. And if upstream fixes it, the debian font packagers do > not need to replicate Fedora's effort. We absolutely want this fixed upstream first. I adjusted the draft to reflect this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Patches/PackagingDrafts/FontsPolicy Sometime this week I'm going to file bugs against all the affected font packages to give packages an opportunity to work with their upstreams to correct this. -T.C. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
