On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:25:45 +0100 "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 03:05:34PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > hi all, > > > > I have imported ARM into primary and enabled armv7hl in the arches to > > be built. right now the KDE stack is not entirely built and brought in > > due to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988114 as soon as it > > is resolved we will get everything fixed and brought in. at that point > > arm will be added to the nightly composes. > > I've just attempted to build mingw-libvirt (which is noarch) in rawhide > and was (unlucky?) that it got scheduled on an ARM builder. The build > failed with > > checking build system type... Invalid configuration `armhfp-redhat-linux-gnu': machine `armhfp-redhat' not recognized IIRC this is an issue of not translating the arm build architecture from armhfp to armv7hl by koji/mock/rpm Dan > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5680000 > > This is odd because the mingw-libvirt src.rpm has the exact same > tar.gz that we use in the native libvirt src.rpm which accepts > arm as a build system type. So I'd expect that the configure > script is already new enough to work with armv7 hosts at least. > > Looking to see if mingw-libvirt was ever tested on ARM secondary > builders, I can't find any build logs. Querying the noarch.rpm > packages hosted on the ARM secondary builder koji host at: > > http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/mingw-libvirt/1.0.5/1.fc20/noarch/ > > shows that they were built on the Fedora primary koji instance. > > Randomly picking some other mingw packages (mingw-libpng and > mingw-libxml2) shows they were also all build on x86 hosts and > trying a build of them on arm hosts causes the same failure. > > So am I right in thinking any noarch RPMs were just copied across > to the ARM koji as-is, without attempting to rebuild them ? > > If so, it seems we might have a bunch of noarch packages which > are going to turn out to be broken if unlucky to have their > builds scheduled on ARM. > > Side-note, even if the packages worked fine, is it a good idea to > allow noarch builds to be scheduled on ARM, given that ARM is so > much slower ? It seems we're wasting precious ARM builder cycles, > as well as maintainer time, by letting noarch builds go to the > slower ARM builders instead of x86 builder hosts. > > /me goes to play russian roulette triggering rebuilds of the > mingw-libvirt package until koji picks an x86 host > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
