Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/26/13, Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 'examples' directory contains arch dependent programs, I can't
> packaging them in /usr/share.

In that case you could consider shipping them in an "-examples"
subpackage if most consumers of the main package won't find them
useful.  Also, you could use %{_libexecdir} if you want the paths to
these binaries to be the same on 32 and 64 bit systems.  Both are
optional though.

> This .spec should be fine:
> http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/MUMPS/MUMPS.mod2.spec

The -common subpackage should be "BuildArch: noarch" but otherwise it
looks good.

-T.C.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux