On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:49:41AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ > > /me goes to the upstream thread to ask Nick what distutils/setuptools/etc > do when they rewrite shebang lines. > > Hmm, patching setuptools to do this for us sounds interesting, although not > everything that has /usr/bin/python uses setuptools for build, unfortunately. > Haven't gotten much response yet but: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2013-July/022002.html I think the use of sys.executable means if we use /usr/bin/python2 setup.py instead of /usr/bin/python setup.py then we'll start to get shebang lines with /usr/bin/python2 instead of embedded /usr/bin/python. That will get us through many of the applications that are installed by packages. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpG8fIyyHcce.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
