Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:30:32PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> How do I package and ship an application that depends on two or more
>> stacks (e.g. uses a database, has a web frontend and perhaps also a
>> local GUI) if the stacks the application depends on can have
>> overlapping and therefore probably (necessarily?) conflicting
>> software, different lifecycles and packaging methods?
>
> I'm not suggesting a crazy free-for-all. If you have an application which
> depends on multiple stacks, you would want to select one technology for all
> of those stacks -- OpenShift cartridges, or Software Collections, or Fedora
> Formulas.

"If I have an application" that hasn't been explicitly written for
Fedora.next, it may already depend on multiple APIs/stacks and I may
end up in a situation with no way to run that application.
    Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux