On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 00:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Looking at Koji from Russian Fedora, I noticed some plugins for Gimp > missing in the current Fedora repository. > I am interested to port them which bring some questions, do I keep > the > original changelog and notify ported from Russian Fedoraor > do I start the new spec with the statement based from Russian Fedora? > > The plugins in question are: > gimp-dds-plugins > gimp-wavelet-denoise-plugins > > Ref: > ---- > http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=gimp* I'm more curious why there are packages at a Fedora downstream that aren't on the main Fedora repositories. Are these non free? If Russian Fedora is a remix that uses packages that are not in Fedora, especially non free ones, it should be following the trademark guidelines, and not use the Fedora logo etc.[1,2]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Secondary_trademark_usage_guidelines?rd=Legal/Secondary_trademark_usage_guidelines [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines#Secondary_Mark -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
