On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 11:19:12AM +0200, Matias Féliciano wrote: > Le lundi 25 octobre 2004 à 09:39 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit : > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:34:35PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 21:15 -0200, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > >From my last "yum update" on, neither yum.conf nor > > > > yum.repositories.d nor up2date related configuration hold any data on > > > > repositories anymore... Consequence: I' m not able to yum or > > > > up2date..... > > > > > > > > The next thing, I tried to download yum and up2date directly from > > > > download.fedora.redhat.com and rpm -Uvh them... No use: configuration > > > > is still missing. > > > > > > > > Where I can get the configuration files ??? > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > 1. you should read the archives of this and the test-list. > > > 2. the configuration files are in the fedora-release package. > > > > That would have been worth a large heads-up. > > > > a) splitting off the config files from the packages was a very good > > thing! It will allow config file updating by Red Hat and/or other > > parties w/o replacing the binaries, > > > > b) putting this into fedora-release is bad, no one wants to replace > > this package, other than fedora derived distros. > > > > It's normal. > Only fedora derived distros will change /etc/yum.repo.d/* files provided > by fedora-release. > > > Could the config files be put into `fedora-config-package' or similar? > > Please? :) > > I does not understand your point. > You can provide fedora-release-atrpms with /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo. I thought all of /etc/yum* had migrated to fedora-release, not only the /etc/yum.repos.d/* entries. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpjKwDyDnfu3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
