On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 18:08 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:12:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > So, to put a number on it, does that mean _at_ the change freeze and branch > > > which is "no earlier than 2013-08-06"? > > As things stand, yeah. I think for F19 we actually started doing TCs > > earlier, but certainly by then. > > Okay, cool. I wil draft up a minor revision to the existing EC2 test case > and create one in the same vein for OpenStack. > > Do you think those tests are too much for alpha? It doesn't seem unreasonable. > The most simple proposal is > simply to make those the alpha criteria and not, yet at least, develop > anything more for further. (I'll also look through the existing criteria and > note any where a cloud image note might be appropriate.) Alternately, we > could make those the beta critera and have "we can generate an image at all" > as alpha, at least for this time around. (What with it being the first time > we'll properly _have_ an image at alpha.) I think we could give that a shot. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel