On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:12:46PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > You do realize I filed for the exact same thing for F18 as is being > proposed here. I know, at least. And, as I said earlier in a different subthread (I don't think you replied), the rejection didn't seem to me (I wasn't involved at the time) to be very harsh -- just that it wasn't ready yet. So, things have changed, because a year is a long time in the development of an early-stages software project like this. And, there's the impact on the cloud images, which wasn't a consideration before. So, it seemed worth proposing again. I don't think that _either_ invalidates your earlier proposal or makes the previous FESCO decision wrong. All of that said, I think many of are still very confused about the relevance your count of packages which have non-syslog log files. Can you help explain the relevance? If you have constructive suggestions for how this proposal could be improved, let's hear them, please! -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
