On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:12:42PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> There probably is a minimal packageset, though. the kernel, glibc, gcc,
>> and rpm would all be on my list. Given that fesco has a policy about the
>> package depsolver having to be the same on all spins, probably the current
>> depdolving package manager as well. Default init system and bash are also
>> likely although someone might be able to make a case for alternatives to
>> the defaults being okay... with emphasis on "might".
>
> Paging mitr and the "Fedora Base Design"!
The base design component the revamp proposal from FUDCon Lawrence
focused on better change coordination for the "base"; I don't think it
implied that the "base" part should be shipped, or even necessarily
useful, stand-alone.
There are other proposals being worked on by other people that go in
that direction, though :)
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
