Am 15.07.2013 16:44, schrieb Michal Schmidt: > On 07/13/2013 01:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> please take a look at this >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982740#c12 >> >> what do we do in the future to disable ipv6 entirely >> and why is "ipv6.disable=1" as kernel param at least >> with 3.10.0-1.fc20.x86_64 on F19? > > Back in 2011 the preferred kernel parameter to do that was "ipv6.disable_ipv6=1": > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2011-June/003106.html > I assume it's still true today. > > "ipv6.disable=1" should still work though. I still see it handled net/ipv6/af_inet6.c. > > In the linked Bugzilla comment you mentioned "ipv6disable=1" (without a dot). Did this ever work? I think it's a typo thanks for your feedback, yes this was a typo however, i removed it over the weekend and disabled ipv6 with sysctl software like ntpd, smbd still insists in listening on ipv6 sockets and the maintainers of the packages says this inconsistent behavior is fine _______________________________________________________ udp 0 0 *:ntp *:* udp6 0 0 [::]:ntp [::]:* tcp6 0 0 :::139 :::* LISTEN 3079/smbd tcp6 0 0 :::445 :::* LISTEN 3079/smbd _______________________________________________________ /etc/sysctl.conf net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_redirects=0 net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_source_route=0 net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_redirects=0 net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_source_route=0
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
