Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:37:41AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 02:17:28PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949328
> > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869540
> 
> Often, people maintain a package because it's required for a certain use
> case they have not necessarily for particular love for that package. That's
> not the idea situation, but it's better than not having the package at all,
> and crucially, it means the actual use case that someone cares about is
> covered. 
> 
> I'm sure Peter would be happy to have a co-maintainer for the syslinux
> package. I'd volunteer, but I'm actually _also_ only interested in a small
> subset of functionality and am not able to address the bigger picture
> either. But if someone would show up and really want to do it justice,
> *awesome*.

FWIW, right now we can't update to 6.01 until we move to gnu-efi-3.0t,
which we haven't done because there's some debugging which needs to be
done there to avoid breaking the other packages that use it.  It is on
the radar, and something I hope to address in the next few weeks, with
any luck.  That said, this stuff is notoriously hard to debug, as you
may have noticed.

-- 
        Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux