On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:37:41AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 02:17:28PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949328 > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869540 > > Often, people maintain a package because it's required for a certain use > case they have not necessarily for particular love for that package. That's > not the idea situation, but it's better than not having the package at all, > and crucially, it means the actual use case that someone cares about is > covered. > > I'm sure Peter would be happy to have a co-maintainer for the syslinux > package. I'd volunteer, but I'm actually _also_ only interested in a small > subset of functionality and am not able to address the bigger picture > either. But if someone would show up and really want to do it justice, > *awesome*. FWIW, right now we can't update to 6.01 until we move to gnu-efi-3.0t, which we haven't done because there's some debugging which needs to be done there to avoid breaking the other packages that use it. It is on the radar, and something I hope to address in the next few weeks, with any luck. That said, this stuff is notoriously hard to debug, as you may have noticed. -- Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel