On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Please consider the idea that there is a useful middle ground "Primary" and > "Secondary". With the FESCo-member-as-elected-by-contributors hat on, there really isn't a middle: The individual packagers are either responsible for making their package work on ARM or not. > It might be multidimensional: > > Primary Desktop---Secondary Desktop > | | > Primary Server----Secondary Server ... and with the FESCo-member-interacting-with-rel-eng-and-qa-and-others hat on, the idea of a "server-only ARM release" is fairly plausible to me. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel