-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:12:03 -0400 (EDT) Aleksandar Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 > > 11:56:40 PM Subject: Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary > > Architecture > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:17:47PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 08:28 -0400, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > I still have serious concerns regarding build times: > > > > * arm - > > > > https://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=150248 > > > > ~ 17h > > > > * current primary - > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=429023 > > > > ~1h 30m > > > > > > > > This is still too huge gap - roughly 10 times slower. If ARM > > > > will become primary arch I hope this is an exception and not > > > > the general rule. > > > > > > FWIW, the last libreoffice arm build of > > > https://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=152413, > > > took approx 14 hours. While > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=432079 took > > > approx 5 hours on x86 > > > > > > I can probably live with that without to much suffering, but it > > > does push build times from "start build today, get result today" > > > to "start build today, get results tomorrow". > > > > Just a note that Koji is currently configured to time out builds > > after 24 hours. > > > > Not that you'd want your builds taking longer than this, but it's > > may affect the discussion ... > > I started a new f20 build to see how things will go on and Koji > estimates it to around 20h. See > https://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1974977 . > What are the possibilities for koji time out to be changed to 48h > if/when arm becomes primary? This would be highly needed to not have > to resubmit builds because koji timed out cause it hit slow builder. > We have seen that few times when we tried to bootstrap secondary > archs. It is a viable option to give us some room just incase. Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlHeUfEACgkQkSxm47BaWfeOhACfbTvB/um7Vipr1TSWH/oP8AGY wkMAoK/Y5SeqnYAB7q4arf0yg/3QvUiG =Ywqd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
