Hi, On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:58:22 +0200 Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > The following packages currently depend on xine-lib: > > * gxine > > * (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected) > > * kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first > > place) > > * oxine > > * xine-plugin > > * xine-ui > > These packages would have to move to RPM Fusion along with xine-lib. > > Fwiw, I've rebuilt all the above packages (but k9copy, not tested yet) > against the xine-lib 1.2.3 rpm I prepared and all the builds succeeded. > No runtime tests yet. > > Would all the impacted maintainers be ok to move their package to RPM > Fusion, alongside with xine-lib 1.2 ? > > Regards, > Xavier I'd welcome volunteer to take gxine over from me as I'm not using it anymore myself and upstream isn't very dynamic either (I went through switching between various javascript versions in Fedora because mozilla folks keep breaking API/ABI hyperfast all too much; AFAIK current mozjs from xulrunner still isn't supported). But if no-one volunteers I'll maintain gxine in rpmfusion as well. But seriously, CVS and plague? That's stone age for me... Will need to refresh my memory... Regards, Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
