On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:19:33AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> armv7 has stack protector, aarch64 which is outside of this proposal >> doesnt yet have it. > > Only i?86/x86_64/ppc/ppc64/s390/s390x/sparc/sparc64/tilegx/tilepro > really have full stack protector support, while perhaps -fstack-protector > doesn't error out on armv7, it certainly isn't supported in glibc > (neither TLS stack guard, not TLS pointer guard), so I wouldn't talk about > arm having security standards high enough for being a primary architecture. So what does the kernel level CC_STACKPROTECTOR config option bring to this as it appears to be associated with the -fstack-protector option as well (according to it's Kconfig description) but is only supported on x86/arm from that list above (plus sh). Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
