On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:02:57AM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > I don't see a problem with different set of blocking desktops for ARM, even > as primary architecture. But it's really about resources - do we have people > willing to work for example on LXDE (I'd say more resources friendly for > current ARMs) - not saying there are no people, but more to support it as > blocking desktop, if QA would be able to validate three desktops on two > different platforms... And as we try to avoid "default" world in Fedora now, > let's have LXDE "default" in some cases. I do. Fedora is a Linux distribution that has a specific set of software available, and runs a specific desktop by default. We have a process whereby people can produce Fedora variants with different defaults, and we release those as spins. If ARM wants to be *Fedora*, it should behave identically to the other Fedora architectures. If ARM merely wants to be able to produce something that's similar to Fedora then we should figure out what a spin-based PA would look like, but that's not what's currently being proposed. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
