Re: Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Xavier Bachelot venit, vidit, dixit 10.07.2013 10:58:
> Hi,
> 
> On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> The following packages currently depend on xine-lib:
>> * gxine
>> * (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected)
>> * kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first place)
>> * oxine
>> * xine-plugin
>> * xine-ui
>> These packages would have to move to RPM Fusion along with xine-lib.
> 
> Fwiw, I've rebuilt all the above packages (but k9copy, not tested yet) 
> against the xine-lib 1.2.3 rpm I prepared and all the builds succeeded. 
> No runtime tests yet.
> 
> Would all the impacted maintainers be ok to move their package to RPM 
> Fusion, alongside with xine-lib 1.2 ?

Yes, more than happy. I assume that packages such as xine-ui would be
subsumed in other packages then? I'd pass over maintainership to the
corresponding superpackage maintainer then.

Michael
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux