On 2013-07-09 17:36, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
I've had an entry on my todo list _forever_ to complete the
'deliverables SOP' I started several releases ago:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_releng_SOP_deliverables
(I don't really like the current layout, I was planning on revising
it)
The addition of a new arch with quite a pile of 'supported images'
would certainly raise the priority of having such a thing. (We're
already hitting a problem with our *current* primary arches in this
area, though, in that the status of the multi-live, multi-arch and
cloud/appliance images is rather unclear).
Plus, in relation to this - the llvmpipe issue brings up that one of
the 'release blocking desktops' *does not work*. This would, by
definition,
block the release unless we intend to have different criteria for ARM
as a
primary arch.
Outside of that, how might we expect release criteria to change for
ARM,
given the different deliverables that are planned?
I've looked at that several times, and I don't really think the criteria
need to change much at all. The way they're currently worded covers ARM
pretty well, I think. We revised them quite extensively for F19 and I
tried to keep ARM in mind in the wording used there.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
