On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:This is also a perfect example of useless "does not fix bug x" karma.
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten <py@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we have something like
>> "freeze tag changes until desc is better".
>>
>> I propose this because testers will not _really_ want to -1 karma, and
>> as a maintainer it might be a bit hard, but with a good reminder like
>> "not pushed to stable until desc is better" I would have made less
>> mistakes
>>
>> yes not being reminded is not an excuse and such proposal would not save
>> time, still I believe it could help more than hurt
>
>
> There is already a perfect example of this.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-3.12.1-57.fc19
If it is not *worse* then the previous package there is no reason to
give it negative karma.
If it doesn't fix the bugs, the update should fix, it is appropriate to give negative karma. Otherwise the bugs would be closed, when it becomes stable, but won't be fixed.
Johannes
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
