Re: fedup performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/03/2013 07:42 AM, Alex G. wrote:
On 07/02/2013 08:28 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Not d/l speed related.  I just want to share.  I update a very fast 8 core
server, with a conventional disk drive.  Took 2-3 hours, not including d/l.

I update my laptop which has an ssd (and MORE packages).  Took 10-15 minutes.

I think this might simply have to do with rpm running ldconfig (a very
disk IO expensive operation) for a large number of packages. I'm not
sure yum/rpm has deferred ldconfig processing.

DISCLAIMER: I may be very wrong. Please don't quote me on this.

ldconfig gets run a lot yes, but its also really fast these days. fdatasync() which gets called even more (a lot more at that) seems like a more likely painpoint on upgrades.

	- Panu -
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux