On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:01:29PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > And as far as the tooling is concerned... this is the matter of writing > just one extra sentence, so even if we did have awesome technology to > write the update description for you from the RPM changelog, and even if > it was considered acceptable to present that to users, it's not like > that would save a ton of time and effort. According to Bodhi it would have saved more than 10000 sentences for Fedora 17. > I absolutely think there should be at least some minimal level of > quality to what we present to users in the default graphical update > interface.... You easily get a good minimal level of quality by just using the available information in an update such as the type and mentioned bug reports. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
