On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:44:22PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > We need written policy on update descriptions, since despite the last > discussion on this list [1], poor update descriptions continue to > blemish the otherwise-professional image of the distro. A starting point > suggestion: "Every update should have at least a one sentence > description." If the update is not worth writing one sentence about, it > is not worth pushing out. If the update fixes a bug which is properly mentioned in the bugs field, why does this fact need to be mentioned again in the update notes? It should be obvious that an update fixing a bug is worth pushing out. Also instead of writing policy, better make Bodhi allow to easier write good update notes, e.g. by using/including the upstream, RPM or GIT changelog, so it can be easily used if it already contains the necessary information. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
