Am 26.06.2013 23:10, schrieb Josh Boyer: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Am 26.06.2013 21:10, schrieb Bill Nottingham: >>> * #1128 switching from "-fstack-protector" to >>> "-fstack-protector-strong" in Fedora 20 (notting, 18:10:54) >>> * AGREED: Will switch from "-fstack-protector" to >>> "-fstack-protector-strong" in Fedora 20. Any reversion based on poor >>> benchmarks must be decided before any F20 gcc mass rebuild (+:6, >>> -:0, 0:0) (notting, 18:28:38) >> >> *thank you* for that >> >> would it be possible to add the patch for supporting >> "-fstack-protector-strong" for F18's GCC which would >> give a larger testbase at least from users like me >> building all serverpackages in the own infrastructure >> currently with "-f-stackprotector-all"? > > I would be doubtful the Fedora GCC maintainer would find that > acceptable to backport and push out in a stable Fedora release. We do > development like this in rawhide for a reason "-fstack-protector-strong" would *not* be enabled anywhere with what i requested - it would only be *possible* to use it within Fedora 18 - IMHO a big difference
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
