On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 23:21 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:40 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:> Hi there,> > I setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates) as a XEN server and installed a> Fedora 19 as a domU client. > > You may want to check these bugs: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=977974https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=977987https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=978036 > > and compare notes with Konrad and Dario. Thanks!-- Adam WilliamsonFedora QA Community MonkeyIRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedorahttp://www.happyassassin.net > > -- devel mailing listdevel@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > Yes, only 978036 is relevant for thsi case. Konrad refers to my > patch posted to the xen-devel list. > Konrad mentioned this bugzilla number but I was not aware he > added this to it. > > Does that mean this will be included in the final Fedora 19? At present, no. I'm relying on Konrad's reading of the situation and he seems to think that F19 is fundamentally capable of operating as DomU and we can fix the problems with post-release updates - we don't actually need to fix anything in the release images themselves. Do you disagree with this assessment? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
