Re: bugzilla.redhat.com vs upstream bug trackers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 17.06.2013 15:00, schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I would like to avoid creating accounts in gazillion upstream bug trackers,
> 
> Aha! Should the package maintainers play the middle man in the
> gazillion upstream bug tracker accounts? This sounds neither very
> thoughtful nor quite efficient.

i expect a *package maintain er* has already a account in the upstream
tracker of packages he maintains - nobody says he needs a gazillion
accounts, but usually he has for the packages he maintains

the ordinary user has a few thousand packages installed

>> so bugzilla.redhat.com as a single point of contact is very helpful to me.
> 
> I wish life was that easy!

it should be that easy

answering in a bugreport "file the bugreport upstream" is the best
way after the third time never ever get any bugrpeort from this
person

> Basically, if it is RPM packaging specific enhancement/bug

does not matter from the viewpoint of a *ordinary user*
nor is he able to know if it is the case

> or if upstream uses bugzilla.redhat.com as their primary bugtracker

does not matter from the viewpoint of a *ordinary user*

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux