Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:25:44 -0600
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130616104906.7f029ad0@jelerak.scrye.com>
Organization: Scrye, INC
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Should be all fixed now. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  - From: Björn Esser

References:
- Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  - From: Björn Esser
- Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  - From: Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  - From: Björn Esser
- Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  - From: Kevin Fenzi

Prev by Date: [aarch64 bugs] dpkg: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide bug #925276
Next by Date: Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Previous by thread: Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Next by thread: Re: Issues with metalink to fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux