On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:14:25 -0700 Corey Quinn <corey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:50:05 -0400 > > Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> It's exceptionally difficult and unreliable for RHEL or CentOS to > >> build packages for current or recent releases with "mock" or other > >> chroot cage tool kits. Too many non-backwards compatible changes in > >> RPM and yum. > > > > Hum? rpm and yum in the mock chroot are the versions from > > RHEL/CentOS when you are building against those. Perhaps I am not > > parsing what you are saying here. > > Right. Nico is asserting that building packages for modern Fedora on > RHEL or CentOS is difficult and unreliable. Building packages for > RHEL or CentOS on modern Fedora is trivial. Ah, I see. IMHO, you should use mock anytime you build any packages, and if you do that, the platform you run mock on largely doesn't matter (with a few rare corner cases). kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel