Miloslav Trmač (mitr@xxxxxxxx) said: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Any reason we don't run with namespaced /dev/shm vis-a-vis private /tmp? > > Private /tmp is optional and not enabled for users sessions by > default. For namespaced /dev/shm to impact pulseaudio, it would have > to be applied automatically to every user session (making the > system-wide /dev/shm unaccessible?). Right, it would break something that requires sharing SHM segments across sessions, or between system and sessions via 0666 SHM segments. I'm just curious what things actually do that. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
